Main Article Content
The method used in this research is through exploration of data from questionnaires collected using simple arithmetic techniques and graphic techniques in summarizing the observational data. The number of respondents who responded to the questionnaire that was run until this data was processed was 111 respondents.
The results of this study indicate that the application of green building benchmarks can be said to have been implemented because the average percentage of respondents who answered Yes was 58.4% or above the standardization used in this study, namely 57% (gold rank).
This research provides theoretical implications, which is able to strengthen the theory of the reliability of accounting. One of them is green accounting, which is the triple bottom line (planet, people and profit). In order that implementation of green building which has been applied only from the civil engineering condition of the building, the art of building architecture and the electrical engineering of the building, but now it has begun to be calculated regarding advantages and disadvantages similarly the benefit of the green building .
From a micro economics (organizational) point of view, this research contributes to educating property business and stakeholders that green building is not object that is expensive although is a solution for cost efficiency. People can distinguish the price of green buildings and ordinary buildings.
- Journal publication right belongs to journal management with the author's knowledge, while moral publication right belongs to the author.
- The formal legal aspect of the journal publication accessibility refers to the Creative Commons license Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative (CC BY-NC-ND), which means that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes and in its original form (can not be modified).
- Each journal publication (print/electronic) is open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Beyond those, journal management is not responsible for copyright violations by certain parties.
Ahi, P., & Searcy, C. (2015). Assessing sustainability in the supply chain: A triple bottom line approach. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 39(10–11), 2882–2896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.10.055
Atkinson, G., & Mourato, S. (2008). Environmental cost-benefit analysis. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.020107.112927
Bebbington, J., & Larrinaga, C. (2014). Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration. Accounting, Organizations, and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.01.003
Berardi, U. (2013). Sustainable Construction: Green Building Design and Delivery. Intelligent Buildings International. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2012.756388
Bianchini, F., & Hewage, K. (2012). How “green” are the green roofs? Lifecycle analysis of green roof materials. Building and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.08.019
Chappell, T. W., & Corps, C. (2009). High-Performance Green Building : What is it Worth? Investigating the Market Value of High-Performance Green Buildings.
Ding, Z., Fan, Z., Tam, V. W. Y., Bian, Y., Li, S., Illankoon, I. M. C. S., & Moon, S. (2018). Green building evaluation system implementation. Building and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.02.012
Esposito, D., & Antonietti, M. (2015). Redefining biorefinery: the search for unconventional building blocks for materials. Chemical Society Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cs00368c
Georg, S., & Justesen, L. (2017). Counting to zero: accounting for a green building. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30(5), 1065–1081. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1320
Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., & Rodon, J. (2012). Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.035
Gou, Z., & Xie, X. (2017). Evolving green building: triple bottom line or regenerative design? Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 600–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.077
Green Building Council Indonesia. (2013). Perangkat Penilaian GREENSHIP (GREENSHIP Rating Tools). Greenship New Building Versi 1.2.
Hamilton, B. A. (2015). Green Building Economic Impact Study. 83. Retrieved from https://kapost-files-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/published/56438d353dab34e8a1000061/green-building-economic-impact-study.pdf?kui=ntZxSELuij0YNSwkwEO_Kw
Komalasari, R. I., Purwanto, & Suharyanto. (2013). Kajian Green Building Berdasarkan Kriteria Tepat Guna Lahan (Appropriate Site Development) pada Gedung Pascasarjana B Universitas Diponegoro Semarang. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam Dan Lingkungan 2013, 442–428.
Kubba, S. (2017). Green Building Materials and Products. In Handbook of Green Building Design and Construction. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-810433-0.00006-x
Milani, B. (2005). Building Materials in a Green Economy. Environmental Studies.
Nicoletti Junior, A., de Oliveira, M. C., & Helleno, A. L. (2018). Sustainability evaluation model for manufacturing systems based on the correlation between triple bottom line dimensions and balanced scorecard perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.136
Ojo-Fafore, E., Aigbavboa, C., & Remaru, P. (2018). Benefits of green buildings. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management.
Parris, T. M. (2007). Green Buildings. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 49(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.3200/envt.49.1.3-7
Prum, D. A. (2012). The Next Green Issue: Considering Property Insurance for the Green Building. SSRN, 421–458. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2159743
Ramos, L. (2012). Critical overview of selected contemporary sample preparation techniques. Journal of Chromatography A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2011.11.011
Rizki Andini dan Christiono Utomo. (2014). Analisa Pengaruh Penerapan Konsep Green Building Terhadap Keputusan Investasi pada National Hospital Surabaya. 3(2), 53–56.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business : a skill-building approach / Uma Sekaran and Roger Bougie. In Nucleic Acids Research.
Sinha, A., Gupta, R., & Kutnar, A. (2013). Sustainable Development and Green Buildings. Drvna Industrija, 64(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.5552/drind.2013.1205
Syahriyah, D. R. (2018). Penerapan Aspek Green Material Pada Kriteria Bangunan Rumah Lingkungan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.32315/jlbi.6.2.95
WGBC. (2013). The business case for green building: A review of the costs and benefits for developers, investors, and occupants. 1–124.
Xie, X., Lu, Y., & Gou, Z. (2017). Green building pro-environment behaviors: Are green users also green buyers? Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(10), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101703
Xue, J., & Shinozuka, M. (2013). Rubberized concrete: A green structural material with enhanced energy-dissipation capability. Construction and Building Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.005
Yook, K. H., Song, H., Patten, D. M., & Kim, I. W. (2017). The disclosure of environmental conservation costs and its relation to eco-efficiency: Evidence from Japan. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(1), 20–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2016-0039
Yoshida, J., Onishi, J., & Shimizu, C. (2018). Energy Efficiency and Green Building Markets in Japan. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2844040