Main Article Content

Aisyah Zakiah


Cities are facing a challenge with the steady increase in energy consumption for buildings. This study aims to analyse the energy consumption and payback period of energy-efficient strategy implementation in glass type options. The energy-efficient strategy in the glass options is chosen since it affects the energy consumption the most. A study on the payback period needs to be conducted since purchasing high-performance glass materials increase the building capital cost and become a consideration for decision-maker. This study tested 5 variations, including single and double glass windows and incorporating 5 types of glass materials with various solar transmittance properties. The energy consumption then is calculated using energy simulation software OpenStudio using Jakarta weather data. The payback period is calculated to find out the length of time the energy cost saving can recoup the additional capital cost needs to purchase better thermal performance glass. The result shows that the double glass windows with low solar transmittance value reduce the energy consumption for cooling the most. Thus, cheaper glass material with similar solar transmittance value reaches the payback period fastest.



Download data is not yet available.

Plum Analytics

Article Details



Aldawoud, A. (2017). Assessing the energy performance of modern glass facade systems.MATEC Web of Conferences, 120, 1–7.

Delgado, L., Shealy, T., Garvin, M., & Pearce, A. (2018). Framing Energy Efficiency with Payback Period: Empirical Study to Increase Energy Consideration during Facility Procurement Processes. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(5), 1–9.

DKI Jakarta Province Govenment. (2012). Selubung bangunan. Panduan Pengguna Bangunan Gedung Hijau Jakarta, 1(38), 44.

Dogrusoy, I. T. &Tureyen, M. (2007). A field study on determination of preferences for windows in office environments. Building and Environment, 42(10), 3660–3668.

Harkouss, F., Fardoun, F., and Biwole, PH. (2018), Passive design optimization of low energy buildings in different climates. Energy. 165, pp. 591-613

Hassouneh, K., Alshboul, A., & Al-Salaymeh, A. (2010). Influence of windows on the energy balance of apartment buildings in Amman. Energy Conversion and Management, 51(8), 1583–1591.

Hong, T., Lee, M., Yeom, S., &Jeong, K. (2019). Occupant responses on satisfaction with window size in physical and virtual built environments.Building and Environment, 166(September).

Kaasalainen, T., Mäkinen, A., Lehtinen, T., Moisio, M., &Vinha, J. (2020). Architectural window design and energy efficiency: Impacts on heating, cooling and lighting needs in Finnish climates. Journal of Building Engineering, 27(October 2019).

Kirimtat, A., Koyunbaba, B. K., Chatzikonstantinou, I., &Sariyildiz, S. (2016). Review of simulation modeling for shading devices in buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 23–49.

Menzies, G. F., & Wherrett, J. R. (2005). Multiglazed windows: Potential for savings in energy, emissions and cost. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 26(3), 249–258.

Noh, B., Son, J., Park, H., & Chang, S. (2017). In-depth analysis of energy efficiency related factors in commercial buildings using data cube and association rule mining. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(11).

Ozel, M. (2019). Influence of glazing area on optimum thickness of insulation for different wall orientations. Applied Thermal Engineering.

Scott, S. (2007). A Study of Glazing Design for Energy Savings in Sustainable Construction. Cornell University School of Civil and Environmental Engineering.

Yu, C., Du, J., & Pan, W. (2019). Improving accuracy in building energy simulation via evaluating occupant behaviors: a case study in Hong Kong. Energy and Buildings, 19